Tuesday, July 9, 2024

Messianic Hopes of Different Kinds

by Dr. Geulah Paran, Professors for a Strong Israel, translated by Hillel Fendel.




"Messianics, zealots, delusionals" – these have become the derogatory nicknames of choice to term the members of the Religious Zionist party and, sometimes, the camp in general. Journalists, politicians, former military officers of the "conception" mindset that proved to be so catastrophic – all of them have taken to accept as a given that "extremist right-wing Messianism" is one of the main dangers facing the State of Israel. 

The left has lost its way. It used to have a Golden Calf before which it bowed down, in the form of imaginary "peace in the Middle East." However, it came crashing down with a great thud on the 7th of October, and the left now has no place to hang its sorrow and disappointment. Nothing remains of its weltanschauung, and in its bitterness and anger (at itself?), it has turned on those who were actually correct. As Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich said this week, "Isn't it time you listened to us, given that we have been right for 30 years now?" 

The nationalist/religious/right in Israel has been proven correct in its warnings against the Oslo agreements, and when it cried out, "Don't give them guns!" It was similarly on the mark when it objected to leaving Lebanon and turning our backs on the soldiers of the Southern Lebanese Army, and most certainly when we begged the government not to disengage and quit Gush Katif (Gaza) and the northern Shomron.

Truth be told, it is not easy to admit a mistake, and especially when its consequences were so grave. The integrity needed to acknowledge an error is a rare commodity within the progressive-liberal left camp. Instead, they often replace it with something known as "projection." This is a defense mechanism that protects those who use it from dealing with emotional matters that are simply unbearable. The process is to take the "threatening content" and "project it" upon, or attribute it to, the other side. Thus, the offending party – the left, in this case – avoids confronting the issue and can relate to it as something of total irrelevance.

Some of those in the so-called "peace camp" have actually taken stock of their views and have admitted the error of their ways. Some of them have even gone so far as to say they now recognize there is no one on the other side with whom to make peace.

However, much too many of them, in their bitterness, direct their arrows to those who were right in the first place. They "project" their Messianism – their unshakeable belief in "peace in our time" – on those who believe that the State of Israel is truly destined for greatness. Many, as stated, do not suffice with calling them Messianists, and add in "extremist" and "delusional' to boot.

My heart goes out to them. It is hard to live in the State of Israel without faith and belief. In every dispute between right and left, the latter will always chime in with a challenging, "What, shall we have war forever?!" The answer from the believer is invariably, "We have no choice in the matter, but we have faith in the Eternity of Israel and in the coming of the Messiah." In response the left would smirk and scoff, taking their own "Messianism" back to their imaginary, longed-for "peace." But now, to where can they take it? The left-wingers can only lash out at those whose faith continues to strengthen them. 

For some, the breaking of their faith weakens them on all fronts, and they can't even fight their enemies, while those whose faith is renewed daily are able to continue fighting for the sublime cause, knowing that they can, must, and will continue until victory.

It could be that even more former peaceniks than we think have allowed the events to affect their thinking and have made a careful accounting of their convictions. But a small and very vocal minority is still holed up in its anger and disappointment, and is seeking – successfully, to an extent – to revive the protest movement that took over our country until last October 6th. They have a different excuse each time: "The government must be toppled! The hareidim must be drafted! The captives must be freed at any price! We will never cooperate with the dangerous Messianists!"

And who are these Messianits that they are referring to? Parents and families of fallen soldiers, true heroes who went out on Oct. 7th to save Jews with practically their bare hands, and who continue to fight – and die – in battle today to protect those who scorn them.

The recent funeral of fallen IDF soldier Elon Veiss, a 49-year-old reservist commander who insisted on serving in combat even at his advanced age, was a lesson for all sides. After the singing of Hatikvah, the participants continued soulfully with the words of Maimonides: "Ani Maamin – I believe with perfect faith in the coming of the Messiah, and even if he tarries, I will still await his arrival every day." 

Ani Maamin much is more than just a song. It was originally composed during the Holocaust, and provided the Jews with a glimmer of hope in a devastated world that appeared to be all but Jew-free. These words were a spark of Jewish faith – faith in the justness of our path, in the eternity of the Jewish People, and in a blessed future for Am Yisrael in its Land. And in many other funerals, as well, this song was borne on the lips of the mourners – strengthening, comforting, and uniting.

With the strength of this faith, the Nation of Israel fights its enemies until their total defeat, settles the entire Land of Israel with a sense of historic and national mission, and believes that the price it is paying is not in vain. And even when they continue to be mocked as Messianists, they need only remember Menachem Begin's classic words. Addressing himself to those who protested Israel's right to protect itself and bomb the Iraqi reactor, he said: "If there are some bleeding-hearts who want to turn up their noses at our actions – they can remain with crooked noses!"

Hostage Deal Endangers not Netanyahu's Government, but the State of Israel

by Haggai Huberman, translated by Hillel Fendel.

The deal currently being negotiated, according to reports, would turn Israel into a washrag state – acutely endangering our standing in the Middle East.



Former Education Minister and long-time Likud member Limor Livnat, in an interview a few days ago, officially joined the ranks of those who attack Netanyahu for not reaching a deal to free the hostages held by Hamas. She said that his motives for nixing a deal are simply to ensure his government's survival.

Let's ignore, for now, the fact that so far the one nixing the deal has been Hamas. I also don't feel any great need to defend Netanyahu in general, for I really don't know what his motivations are for many of his positions. I can, however, express my opinion on the deal being negotiated, based on the details currently available. And so, my humble opinion is this: 

A deal with Hamas wherein we enable Hamas to continue to rule over Gaza and we withdraw our forces and agree to cease our fire – endangers not only the survival of the current coalition government, but is liable to endanger the survival of the State of Israel altogether. This is not an exaggeration. 

The "photo of the year" that would crown such a deal will include Sinwar walking confidently and heroically among the adulating crowds of Gazans, smiling and flashing V signs in all directions. It will be a constant reminder to the international community, our foes and friends alike, that the powerful Israel was defeated soundly by a terrorist group. Why would this be a defeat? Because not one of the objectives Israel set for itself will have been achieved – not the release of all the hostages (for the current deal stipulates only that some of them will be freed for now), and not the destruction or replacement of Hamas.

The photos of Israeli hostages being welcomed happily by their families will simply not have the power of the shots of Sinwar and his thousands of cheering terrorists and supporters greeting him throughout Gaza. If anything, they will further symbolize the beating that Israel suffered.

If it is thus solidified throughout the world that Israel was vanquished by Hamas, Israel will become a washrag state, which no country in the world will respect or relate to seriously. This would be a fatal blow precisely to our peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, and of course to the Abraham Accords with the UAE and Bahrain – those which the Israeli left so highly regards.

Both Egypt and Jordan agreed to make peace with Israel only after their leaders became convinced that the State of Israel was the most stable and powerful force in the Middle East, and that it would be worth their while to be on its good side.

Egyptian President Sadat reached this conclusion after his country's military failure in the Yom Kippur War of 1973. That war, as the current one, saw Egypt achieve total surprise against Israel and conquer territories – yet it ended with the IDF threatening to enter both Cairo and Damascus. For Jordan, the understanding came even earlier; after it lost critical territories in the Six Day War, it refused to join the attack against Israel in the Yom Kippur War. 

The Abraham Accords with the Gulf states also stemmed from latter's realization that the State of Israel must be reckoned with, not fought against. And Saudi Arabia's desire to be included in the treaty is based on its growing concern at the domination that Iran and its proxies are exercising in the region. The Saudis understand that they must join forces with the primary regional power – the State of Israel – in fighting off the Iranian danger.

But now, if Israel is defeated by a stateless terrorist organization, everything will change. All the above countries will certainly sit down to recalculate their steps and decide if Israel is still on the winning side – or one of the losers.

The State of Israel, with its new washrag image, will receive no sympathy or assistance from anyone. Already today we are under attack by non-countries, such as Hamas, Hizbullah, the Houthis, and other terrorists – and if we release hundreds of terrorists and withdraw from Gaza, this will only increase. When wolves smell weakness, they don't hesitate to pounce.

The bottom line is that if this deal goes through, in exchange for the lives of a few Israelis now and then some more over the course of the next few months of negotiations - and we don't know how many of the 120 hostages are alive; estimates are around 50 - the price we will be forced to pay in the future will be hundreds of other Israeli lives, in a very difficult war, without international aid.

This does not mean that we may not agree to any hostage deal at all. There could possibly be an arrangement whose details might be acceptable. When "freeing the captives" was set as an objective of the war, the intention was not that the IDF would physically rescue each of them from their captivity, which is all but impossible. Rather, it was to create military and other pressures upon Hamas, so that they would agree to release the hostages on terms acceptable to Israel – terms that would not frame Israel as a vanquished country.

This cannot be achieved by periodic forays into Gaza, such as this week's raid on a UNRWA headquarters used as a terrorist base, and not even by air strikes. It certainly cannot happen if we stop the war. We can only achieve the captives' release by taking over more and more Gaza territory, such that Sinwar will truly shake in fear at the sound of Israeli tanks rumbling above his head in his tunnel hideout – as Defense Minister Yoav Gallant boasted at the beginning of the war, though he never attempted to actually execute it. 

If and when the State of Israel begins to use these pressure tactics, when it truly rules over most of the Gaza Strip, when the IDF resumes systematically destroying each and every Hamas tunnel and all the rocket launchers and the rocket manufacturing lines – then and only then will we be able to negotiate the terms of a deal for the captives' release from a position of strength.

Anyone who claims that there is another way not only lives in illusions, but is also deceiving the public.